Government recognises importance of science in CSR announcement
Colleagues,
As you know, Chancellor George Osborne yesterday confirmed the very good news
that the science vote will be relatively protected – with a “cash freeze” over
the four years from 2011-15 for the total allocation to the Research Councils
(around £2.7 billion each year). Taking inflation into account this outcome
equates to a “real cut” of around 8-9%.
The Prime Minister, Chancellor and our own Ministers made a point of stressing
the importance for the UK’s future of a strong and vibrant research base. This
is the argument that we, and the other Councils, made very strongly in our
submissions over the past months to the government, and it’s pleasing that
government responded so positively to the coordinated action from the Councils,
research community, business leaders and supporters such as the Science Is
Vital campaign. Real thanks are due to our Ministers Vince Cable and David
Willetts, as well as to Adrian Smith and his team at BIS, for their work in
convincing government of the benefits of investing in science and research.
However, this result represents real challenges for the research base,
especially coming on top of the reductions in university funding. A “real”
reduction of around 8-9% will force a rethink by all Councils of our forward
plans, and a complicating factor is that the situation in respect to capital
funding is unclear. The Chancellor on Sunday reconfirmed the Diamond Phase III
capital due over the next four years, which is great news, but we won’t have
clarity about ISIS, Hartree or other capital projects or operational capital
for some time.
The next stage will be for BIS to negotiate with all Councils to set specific
allocations, including capital. We do not know whether the “flat cash” outcome
will apply to our budget. We do know that “reverting to the status quo” is not
an option and it continues to be very important for STFC to demonstrate
prioritisation of its science, and clearly articulate how we will achieve
efficiencies and reform our operations to deliver maximum value for the UK.
The Government has already announced it will protect the MRC budget in “real
terms”, and this is very good news for the research supported by our sister
Council. Science Minister David Willetts told reporters in London yesterday he
did not expect this would be “disruptive” for the other Councils, and he also
indicated there were no plans to merge councils or to withdraw from any of our
international subscriptions.
However, we obviously cannot be certain of the impact on our programme,
facilities or staff until we have a final budget. Our Council will continue to
play an important role in overseeing and guiding our final submissions and
decisions, and of course Science Board, PPAN and PALs will have direct input on
any science prioritisation issues.
We expect the next request for information from BIS in the next week, with the
current intention of announcing a Delivery Plan before Christmas. We also need
information from BIS about the impact of “efficiency savings” announced by the
Government totalling £327 million. Mr Willetts said this money would be linked
to changes to the FEC regime as proposed by a recent report by Professor Bill
Wakeham (not the report he authored into physics). In addition, we have to
receive an allocation from BIS for our “administration” budget, which will then
be reduced by one-third over the next four years.
So – a lot of information announced yesterday, and we are thankful for the
relatively small reduction in the science budget. This really is good news, and a strong
endorsement by Government of their faith in us and the other Councils to
deliver world leading science, innovation and skills, and to play a significant
role in contributing to the future economic health of the UK through scientific
and technological advances.
But the CSR outcome isn’t pain free. We have a Council meeting next week, and
the Council CSR sub-group and Executive held a telecon today. We’ll provide you
with more information as it comes to hand. I’d like to personally thank you all
for the work you’ve done so far in helping us make the case. The job’s not
finished.
Keith Mason
Chief Executive Officer
21 October 2010
Page last updated: 21 October 2010
by Mark Foster